Engaging the culture with the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Rules of Engagement:

The stated purpose of this blog is “Engaging the culture with the gospel of Jesus Christ”.
Yet I am becoming increasingly aware of a dangerous mindset that I was adopting. It is possible that I may be the only one frequenting this blog with this erroneous thinking, but I would still like to take this time for a bit of friendly admonishment – just in case.

In engaging the culture with the gospel, I had forgotten that I was to engage it WITH the gospel, not swim in it looking for neat little traces of the gospel. The engagement is to be confrontational not matrimonial.  Now I’m not saying one is not able to see gospel truths in culture. There are traces of redemption in many places, movies, music, art, literature, etc, and it is precisely these points that we can use as a fulcrum to launch us into confronting others within our culture with the good news of the redemption that is in Jesus Christ, that He is both LORD and Savior; although there is another aspect of the gospel that must take effect during this engagement – that of sanctification. In other words, there will be points of confrontation, or areas within the culture we are engaging, that we must seek to change for the glory of God.  Culture, by definition, is “the quality in a person or society that arises from a concern for what is regarded as excellent in arts, letters, manners, scholarly pursuits, etc”. So as we engage our culture we are engaging what those around us exalt as excellent or deem praiseworthy. Some of those things can be “redeemed” and other must be rejected. I’m not giving you a hard/fast rule by which to tell what aspects belong in which pile, but there are a few admonitions I would give (these are some things I have struggled with):

  • Don’t confuse “high” class arts with godly and “low” class arts with carnal. Classical music is no more acceptable a style to God as folk music. (I pick this as it is a major point of contention among some Christians.) Each comes from different cultures and both contain beauty, style, require talent to play, etc. This would be like telling a man who painted a picture of the empty tomb that his picture is wicked because it’s not done in the style of Monet or Rembrandt.
  • Don’t ignore the value system that is depicted by the aspect of culture. This is the other extreme pictured in an attitude of “license”. It takes the aspect (music, art, dress, etc.) and tries to redefine it. This redefinition can be done with some things, and others are so closely tied to the world’s system that they are inseparable (for at least the present time in the culture).
  • Don’t cling to an outdated meaning of an aspect. For example, there was a time when beards in America were worn by those who were flaunting their rebellion. But to say that the same philosophy is touted by those who have beards today would be incorrect. If some today wear their beard for a rebellious reason then they are wrong; but the beard itself doesn’t carry that meaning per the culture.
  • Don’t let your sense of right and wrong be set by the culture. To keep the beard example going, I don’t think one should refrain from having a beard necessarily, just because a majority of rebels do. If one’s reasoning for having one is that Jesus had one, I don’t see why one should permit popular culture to “high-jack” it. (Now, if the beard would stand in the way of the people in the said culture from listening to the gospel, then one should fore go the beard.)
  • Don’t just follow culture. It’s okay to be “in style”, but it’s also okay to be creative. If we’re not careful we, as Christians, will simply let others create music, art, and dress and we will “hi-jack” their ideas. It is okay and expected for the church to be creative in those areas.
  • Don’t associate a particular culture with Christianity. There are some who are stuck, as it were, in the 1940’s. They think Christianity looks, talks, and acts like a 1940’s American. This is grave misconception of most of the modern American Fundamentalist movement. When I say we must engage the culture we are in and thus replace some aspects, I do not mean impose an outdated culture on it. To do this would be to err on the other side so as to not accept anything of the current culture, assuming it’s all evil.
  • Don’t think just because the unbeliever creates something that it’s evil. This is a product of dualistic thinking. Remember Jubal in Genesis 4:21? He was in the lineage of Cain. None of Cain’s descendants called up on The LORD. Yet we are told that Jubal is the father of all those who play lyre and harp. John Gill notes of Jubal in his commentary “he [Jubal] was the father of all such that handle the harp and organ: he was the inventor of instrumental music, both of stringed instruments, such as were touched by the fingers, or struck with a quill, as the “harp”; and of wind instruments, such as were blown, as the “organ,” which seems not to be the same we call so, being a late invention; but however a pleasant instrument, as its name signifies.” It would be wrong for one to say instrumental music is wrong, since an unbeliever invented it. There are many things we use today that benefit or enhance our lives that were devised by unbelievers.

So, in conclusion, what are the rules of engagement? I would say that they are given to us in God’s Word and it is our job, by God’s grace, to seek them out and employ them. We are to do kingdom work, we are to image God, we are to plant banners in every area of culture reclaiming it for the Kingdom. We are to be a light, and salt – to show others how to truly live. We are to engage our culture; and I don’t mean put a ring on it!!

7 responses

  1. Crystal Beeler

    Love this.

    February 12, 2010 at 12:00 am

  2. brandonchristiansullivan

    Grand post!

    February 13, 2010 at 12:10 am

  3. Good post. Your example about beards made me remember a couple I know. He is a 50ish pastor who thinks men wearing earrings isn’t good. His wife doesn’t mind as she thinks it’s just how the culture has changed making something that traditionally in America has been a woman’s way to accessorize into something the men have wanted to now use.

    I guess this cultural change can go back to my thoughts in the previous post about changes in modesty. When the Bible tells us to be modest, it didn’t say what that entailed so naturally it should be up to the culture to decide that. What is considered modest today would have been scandalous 100 years ago – and is thought so in some conservative areas of the world even today.

    I am glad I don’t have to wear skirts past my ankles for society’s sake and I see you enjoy your beard. Will earrings be next? 😉

    Enjoyed this!

    February 14, 2010 at 9:47 am

    • danielpulliam

      Glad you enjoyed the post. However I’m not so sure I agree with the idea that the culture decides what modesty is. There are varying styles within cultures, and some cultures may have a higher standard (a woman not showing her ankles), but I do believe there is a line that must not be crossed, and some cultures cross it. (We are told not to expose particular areas.) Nor do I think Scripture would give us a command to be modest and then leave that word undefined. How would we know what modesty is? The problem I have is when a high standard is set up as THE BIBLICAL standard. For example (a non-modesty related one): Scripture says not to be drunk with wine. Some people preach/teach total abstinence as if it were the biblical standard. Now abstaining from alcohol is not a bad thing. And those who hold that standard are more than welcome to maintain it, but they are not to hold others to it as if it were a Divine imperative.

      Some people approach it from the stance of a “modest attitude”; and how this will reflect in one’s attire. http://www.gotquestions.org/dress-modestly.html
      Although the article cited has some good things to say, I still think, if we take Scripture as a whole, we will find where God draws a line as to modest and immodest.
      I was discussing this issue with a co-worker a while back. She asked me to define modest for her. She said she was thinner, and in those days she would wear “booty shorts” to the mall. I asked her why she wore it then and doesn’t wear it now. She said because then she looked good and now she’s overweight and doesn’t have anything she wants to show off. I told her the way she dresses now is modest (and it is for the most part) and the way she dressed then was immodest. She got the picture. She then told me about a girl we work with who had something to show off but doesn’t, and how she would (if she were “blessed” in that way). I’m not trying to be vulgar, but to explain how we all know what we should keep covered, and yet we all know how to dress if we want others to notice how “blessed” we are.
      There are areas that are to remain covered, when they aren’t (half-covered would fall into this category) then lust begins to rise in the hearts of others. And I think if we spent time in God’s Word, we would be more aware of what God says about things like this. (I am attempting to do just that.)

      Am I making any sense at all?

      February 15, 2010 at 9:13 am

      • Yes, of course you make sense! And I was somewhat writing “tongue in cheek” when I said what I did about culture defining modesty. But I’m glad you discussed it further because what you said needed to be stated, imo.

        Good stuff!

        The Muslims talk about modesty of the heart, but then many try to define what that means for dress codes and what should be covered up. Of course the Quran states what is to be covered although some interpret “hair” among the ornaments of women while others do not. Thus the controversy within Islam for some.

        And on the subject of beards, I couldn’t help but remember that many consider it “sunnah of the Prophet” to grow a beard thus why beards are considered more of a sign of piety among Muslims than clean-shaven faces. In fact in Saudi Arabia where they have morality and vice prevention police, they compel the men to grow their beards!

        Just some cultural tidbits there. Thanks for your explanation!

        February 15, 2010 at 10:50 am

  4. danielpulliam

    “I was somewhat writing “tongue in cheek” when I said what I did about culture defining modesty.”
    Sorry, as It’s difficult to see your sarcastic facial expressions through text. =)
    Glad we understand each other now. I was a bit concerned as I thought what I said in the post was the opposite of what you said tongue-in-cheek. I got it now. Just wanted to make sure I’m not misleading in what I say.

    Thanks for reading, and commenting!!! And your thoughts on Muslim culture are interesting.

    February 15, 2010 at 11:02 am

  5. Mae Miller

    Awesome! teaching,,and its good to ask ?

    September 23, 2014 at 10:12 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s